Cases 1 - 10 of 990
GRABARCZYK et al v. TOWN OF EDINBURGH, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
JASON GRABARCZYK and ANNETTE YOUNG
Defendant:
TOWN OF EDINBURGH, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Harrison v. Evanston Senior Redevelopment LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03608
Plaintiff:
Eddie Harrison
Defendant:
Evanston Senior Redevelopment LLP and Liliya Tkzcheva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Caroline Retzios v. Epic Systems Corporation
as 24-1701
Plaintiff:
CAROLINE T. RETZIOS
Defendant:
EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION
SHELTON v. STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
FELICIA Y. SHELTON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Villega v. Chicago Public Media
as 1:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
VILLEGA REBEKAH
Defendant:
CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Sullivan v. Prop and Rotor Management LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Chloe Sullivan
Defendant:
Prop and Rotor Management LLC, Penny P Properties LLC d/b/a NWIRENTAL.COM, Gary Fund 2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Tony Chaney v. Chicago Housing Authority
as 24-1303
Plaintiff:
TONY CHANEY
Defendant:
CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY
FIREBRAND MINISTRIES, INC. v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
FIREBRAND MINISTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC, et al
as 24-1532
Plaintiff:
MANAL FARHAN
Defendant:
2715 NMA LLC and M. FISHMAN & COMPANY
Kauther v. Salger et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Jamie Kauther
Defendant:
Blake Salger, Benjamin David Demond, Brad Bray-Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
