Cases 101 - 110 of 1,324
Marco Webster v. Chris Ertel
as 22-2519
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCO L. WEBSTER
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRIS ERTEL, Deputy Warden
Diaz v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00658
Petitioner:
Rolando L Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00657
Petitioner:
Rolando L Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00654
Petitioner:
Rolando L Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00655
Petitioner:
Rolando L Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00656
Petitioner:
Rolando L Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00119
Petitioner:
ALFRED L. DAVIS
Respondent:
DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Feeney et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Petitioner:
Joseph L Harris
Respondent:
Charles Feeney, Matthew Smith, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GOLDMAN v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00302
Petitioner:
JAMES L. GOLDMAN
Respondent:
T. RULE and S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fields v. Warden
as 2:2022cv00207
Petitioner:
Da'Ione L Fields
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
