Cases 21 - 30 of 481
KIMBERLIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01162
Petitioner:
BRETT C. KIMBERLIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Belton v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01248
Petitioner:
Emanucel Belton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHANCELLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00307
Petitioner:
KIMBERLY CHANCELLOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Baker, Timme v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00422
Petitioner:
Timme A. Baker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUKHERJEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
MUKUNDA MUKHERJEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
WADE L. WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Krzysztof Lebiedzinski v. USA, et al
as 23-1857
Petitioner / Appellant:
KRZYSZTOF LEBIEDZINSKI
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RAUL MALDONADO, Warden
Muhammad-Curtis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv02761
Petitioner:
Lenolis Muhammad-Curtis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
FLORES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
ADAM B. FLORES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michael Hoffman v. USA
as 23-1671
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL HOFFMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
