General Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 93
SMALLWOOD v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2018cv01038
Respondent: CURTIS T. HILL and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: HOWARD SMALLWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. HILL
as 1:2018cv00966
Petitioner: CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, III
Respondent: CURTIS HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WELLS v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2018cv00548
Respondent: CURTIS HILL and D. ZATECKY
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: EUGENE WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill, Cornelius v. Hepp, Randall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00095
Petitioner: Cornelius Hill
Respondent: Randall R. Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOUGLAS v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2017cv04647
Respondent: KEVIN BUTTS and CURTIS HILL
Petitioner: MONWELL DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARNEY v. HILL
as 1:2017cv04337
Petitioner: ANTUAN HARNEY
Respondent: CURTIS HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00737
Petitioner: Ivory Hill
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00736
Petitioner: Ivory Hill
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EADS v. HILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00179
Petitioner: GLENN EADS
Respondent: HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF and CURTIS HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. HILL
as 1:2017cv02852
Petitioner: CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, III
Respondent: CURTIS HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?