Cases 41 - 50 of 608
Muhammad-Curtis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv02761
Petitioner:
Lenolis Muhammad-Curtis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
FLORES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
ADAM B. FLORES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
KURT JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and Z. COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BOUDREAUX v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
KENDRICK SHANE BOUDREAUX
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michael Hoffman v. USA
as 23-1671
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL HOFFMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HOFFMAN v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOFFMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ROSEMOND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00148
Petitioner:
JAMES J. ROSEMOND
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Belton v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01113
Petitioner:
Emanucel Belton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SUZETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00508
Petitioner:
SUZETT MOFFITT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00097
Petitioner:
KEVIN WHITE
Respondent:
T. RULE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
