Cases 71 - 80 of 608
BIRNELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00432
Petitioner:
JUSTIN BIRNELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pleasant v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv03190
Petitioner:
Termass A Pleasant
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COUNCIL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv01876
Petitioner:
WILLIAM COUNCIL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FENNELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00401
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN V. FENNELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
VIGO COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Carroll v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50318
Petitioner:
Craig Carroll
Respondent:
United States of America, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thomas v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Gentle Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Morgan v. USA
as 22-2493
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID B. MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dixon v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv04118
Plaintiff:
Markell Tyree Dixon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv01623
Petitioner:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Reynolds v. USA
as 22-2403
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL C. REYNOLDS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
