Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Rhett A Martin
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. MITCHELL
as 3:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
ROBERT MARTIN
Respondent:
DAN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00473
Petitioner:
DAVID MARTIN
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00254
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00258
Petitioner:
Anthony C Martin
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv00414
Petitioner:
DONTAY D. MARTIN
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Sheriff
as 1:2023cv00094
Petitioner:
Derrick O Martin
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv02363
Petitioner:
KEVIN MARTIN
Respondent:
REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
