Cases 1 - 10 of 497
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv02211
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thackrey v. Monti et al
as 3:2024cv02128
Respondent:
Daniel Monti and Kwami Raul
Petitioner:
Duane Troy Thackrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sterk v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01319
Respondent:
Danielle Smith, Warden of FPC Pekin and United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Marilyn Sterk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Compton v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00747
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Daniel Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montezon v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01301
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Danielle Smith
Petitioner:
Tina Montezon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
YARD-DANIEL v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
SHADAVIAN YARD-DANIEL
Respondent:
PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sterk v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01287
Respondent:
United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons and Danielle Smith
Petitioner:
Marilyn Sterk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henderson v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv01860
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00400
Petitioner:
DANIEL SMITH
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kitterman v. Monti
as 3:2024cv01852
Petitioner:
Shane A. Kitterman
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
