Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Sims v. Shaver et al
as 3:2019cv50081
Defendant:
Todd Shaver, Bradley Barron, Doug Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Lewis et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Defendant:
Jody Kupferberg, Officer McKinney, Wexford of Indiana and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Porter et al
as 3:2018cv01007
Defendant:
Yancy, Critiren, Flake and others
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2018cv01286
Defendant:
Kristi Constable, Jodi Hoos, Peoria County Courthouse and others
Plaintiff:
Wade William Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODWARD v. MOORE
as 2:2018cv00299
Defendant:
DANIEL LEE MOORE
Plaintiff:
CURTIS WADE WOODWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purcell v. Pucillo et al
as 1:2018cv01656
Plaintiff:
Antonio T. Purcell, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Pucillo, Ricardo Gonzalez, Parole Agent Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. TURPIN et al
as 3:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
PATRICK SCOTT BLACK
Defendant:
CHAD FERGUSON, NICHOLAS HERMANN, BRIAN TURPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Burch et al
as 1:2016cv08866
Plaintiff:
Wade Montgomery
Defendant:
Athony Burch, Becky Williams, State of Ill. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Lee et al
as 1:2016cv07571
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Wade
Defendant:
Lee, Jarlath Heveran, Daniel Pater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Avery et al
as 1:2016cv02362
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Wade
Defendant:
Shundala Avery, Andre Fox, Michael Akim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
