Cases 61 - 70 of 1,330
Harper v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Eazs A. Harper
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Frank Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matheny v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01784
Plaintiff:
Shaun W. Matheny
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Naperville Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
Nequan Vaughn
Defendant:
Naperville Police Department, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Cordero Amos
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Joshua K Burton
Defendant:
Brett Johnson, Officer Luttrell, O'Fallon, IL Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pernell v. Does #1-7 et al
as 3:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Arya Milan Pernell and Aaron Pernell
Defendant:
John Does #1-7, Dan Sproul, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cisco v. Doe
as 2:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Scott Bendix and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braden v. City of Marion Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Travis Wade Braden
Defendant:
City of Marion Illinois, Todd Hunter, Benny Vick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Doe, et al
as 1:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Nathan Matthews
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seybold v. Binegar et al
as 1:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Josephus Seybold
Defendant:
Liberty Binegar, Travis Binegar, Miles Winder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
