Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Moon v. Schreiber et al
as 3:2020cv00880
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Harley G Lappin, Andre Matevousian and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Borrero v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Despaigne Borrero
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, F Castillo, P. Trovillion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lacey v. USA et al
as 3:2010cv00273
Plaintiff:
William P. Lacey
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. A. Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baxter v. Lappin et al
as 3:2009cv00896
Plaintiff:
David Baxter
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, Lt. Samples, Lt. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Medulan v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv01328
Plaintiff:
Lumir L Medulan
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Turner v. United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2009cv00379
Plaintiff:
Brad Turner
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, MICHAEL NALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forest v. Peoria County Jail et al
as 1:2009cv01026
Plaintiff:
Fred Forest
Defendant:
Peoria County Jail, Michael D McCoy, Steven . Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Flute v. Lappin
as 3:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Gary Flute, Sr
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CAVES v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv00188
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON BRYANT CAVES
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ADMINISTRATOR OF D.S.C.C., TRACY JOHNS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRUITT v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv00121
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE PRUITT
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, SHOEMAKER, D QUINONES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
