Cases 1 - 10 of 43
NICOLESCU v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
BOGDAN NICOLESCU
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, M. D. CARAVAJAL, DAVID BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KADAMOVAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), COLLETTE PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WHITE v. DECKER et al
as 1:2022cv02405
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A WHITE
Defendant:
ROBERT KENNETH DECKER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
LOWE v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
JERRY KAY LOWE, JR
Defendant:
RULE, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. RULE et al
as 1:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
JERRY KAY LOWE, JR
Defendant:
RULE, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOFFMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
MONTE G HOFFMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RULE and BARNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Monte G Hoffman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Rule and Barnhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Rule et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Jerry Kay Lowe, Jr
Defendant:
Rule, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and David Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STATOM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv00442
Plaintiff:
REGGIE STATOM
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
RUWALA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv00364
Plaintiff:
BILAL A. RUWALA
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
