Cases 61 - 70 of 809
Eric Holmes v. James Hanlon
as 23-1568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC D. HOLMES
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES P. HANLON
Goodman v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv04033
Plaintiff:
George P Goodman, Jr
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Christine Brannon-Dortch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byron Pierson v. M. Kendra Klump, et al
as 23-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BYRON PIERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
M. KENDRA KLUMP, JAMES P. HANLON, JEFFREY A. BALDWIN and others
Leger v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
William P Leger, Jr
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Castanedo et al
as 3:2023cv50079
Plaintiff:
James G. Williams
Defendant:
Michael P. Castanedo, Tarry Williams and Samantha Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laurence Lovejoy v. Charles Rettig, et al
as 23-1370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURENCE LOVEJOY
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES P. RETTIG and STEVEN T. MNUCHIN
Secrist v. Larson et al
as 3:2022cv03094
Plaintiff:
Dale H. Secrist
Defendant:
Dennis P. Larson, Wexford Health Sources Inc. and Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Municipality of Cook County, The et al
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
James L. Johnson
Defendant:
Municipality of Cook County, The, P. Capron and P. Gumbel Pritchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv02669
Plaintiff:
Robert Gilbert
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Adewale Kuforiji, Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Greene et al
as 3:2022cv03247
Plaintiff:
Michael Carnell Wright
Defendant:
Brittany P Greene, . Maher, Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
