Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Piovanetti v. Evers et al
as 2:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
Jean Andre Piovanetti
Defendant:
Governor Tony Evers, The County of Brown, Brown County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. York et al
as 2:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Luis Vasquez
Defendant:
Ann York, Chrystal Marchant, Mark Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Lontonio v. Tegels et al
as 3:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Lontonio Jamin Decruz Smith, Lontonio Jermaine Smith and Lontonio Smith
Defendant:
Tegels, Capt. Jensen, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tegels et al
as 2:2022cv00969
Plaintiff:
Lontonio Jamin Decruz Smith, Lontonio Jermaine Smith and Lontonio Smith
Defendant:
Warden Tegels, Security Director Jensen, Lieutenant Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilber v. Manlove, et al
as 1:2021cv00521
Plaintiff:
Danny L Wilber
Defendant:
Jeffrey Manlove, MD, Mark Jensen, Waupun Correctional Instution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Beahm et al
as 2:2021cv00250
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, CO Adderton, CO Dorn and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bradley, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jensen
as 2:2021cv00038
Defendant:
Mark Jensen
Plaintiff:
Dewhite Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lasnoski v. Michel et al
as 2:2020cv01836
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Captain Heidi Michel, Emily Blozinski and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Lasnoski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jensen et al
as 2:2020cv00138
Defendant:
Sgt Chapman, John Does and CO Jensen
Plaintiff:
Marcus S Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Chapman et al
as 2:2020cv00105
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, CO Jensen and Sgt Chapman
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
