Cases 121 - 130 of 1,034
Walls v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2022cv04178
Plaintiff:
William Walls
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Cook County State's Attorneys Office, Illinois Attorney General Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. Epperson et al
as 4:2022cv04161
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
William Epperson, P. Lodge, A Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Weir et al
as 4:2022cv04169
Plaintiff:
Keith Hill
Defendant:
. Weir, . Baptiste, Mara Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford v. Donathan
as 4:2022cv04153
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford
Defendant:
Gregg Donathan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jumper et al
as 4:2022cv04146
Plaintiff:
Keith Hill
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, A Cobb and A Hoyt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson v. Scott et al
as 4:2022cv04163
Plaintiff:
John Swanson
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Greg Donathan, Eric Kunkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Don Collins v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 22-2679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DON COLLINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS, ANDREA S. TACK, DAIDRA MARANO and others
Kugler v. Donathan et al
as 4:2022cv04138
Plaintiff:
Devin Kugler
Defendant:
Gregory Donathan, Erin Posey, William Epperson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Shah et al
as 4:2022cv04129
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Vipin Shah, IDHS/TDF Medical Director and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
as 4:2022cv04130
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Corp, Ashley Adwell and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
