Cases 31 - 40 of 44
CLARK v. ENERTOUCH, INC.
as 1:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CLARK
Defendant:
ENERTOUCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
BRADLEY VAN-PATTEN et al v. INDIANA PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
as 1:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
STACEY BRADLEY VAN-PATTEN, VALERIE CARY, CONNIE CLARK and others
Defendant:
INDIANA PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Basterash et al v. MedX, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07814
Plaintiff:
Scott Basterash and Carl R. Clark
Defendant:
MedX, Inc., MedX, LLC, Sean McDermott and others
Respondent:
Anthony M. Sciara
Petitioner:
Larry D. Gasper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harris v. Reliable Reports Inc
as 1:2013cv00210
Defendant:
Reliable Reports Inc
Counter Defendant:
Clark Trotter
Plaintiff:
Matthew Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cosentino et al v. Transcend Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03627
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Zier-Teitler, Margaret E. Mackey, Denese Dugay and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DICKEN v. MCDS VENTURES, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00045
Defendant:
JERRY CLARK, MICHAEL CRAFTON and MCDS VENTURES, LLC
Plaintiff:
ANDREW S. DICKEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FOUGNIES v. MCDS VENTURES, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00043
Defendant:
JERRY CLARK, MICHAEL CRAFTON and MCDS VENTURES, LLC
Plaintiff:
JENNA M FOUGNIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Clark v. Honey-Jam Cafe, LLC
as 1:2011cv03842
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Clark
Defendant:
Honey-Jam Cafe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clark v. Pioneer Packaging LLC
as 1:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jeff Clark
Defendant:
Pioneer Packaging LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Blakes et al v. AT&T Corp.
as 1:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
James Blakes , Steven Clark , Herman Deckys and others
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telehone Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
