Cases 51 - 60 of 8,548
Powell et al v. Burke Dermatology S.C., et al
as 1:2024cv03265
Plaintiff:
Deborah Powell and Megan Mears
Defendant:
Burke Dermatology S.C.,, William Burke and Jennifer Burke
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
BRISENO v. UNITED AMERICAN SECURITY LLC d/b/a GARDAWORLD
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Martin Briseno
Defendant:
United American Security LLC d/b/a Gardaworld
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez Cruz v. Villa Nail Salon & Spa Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03212
Plaintiff:
Rocio Lopez Cruz
Defendant:
Villa Nail Salon & Spa Inc. and Vinnie Nguyen
Su v. Unity Home Healthcare LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Julie A Su
Defendant:
Unity Home Healthcare LLC, Edward Thompson and Debra J Brooks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KING v. BASEMENT SYSTEMS OF INDIANA, LLC
as 1:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
JOHN KING
Defendant:
BASEMENT SYSTEMS OF INDIANA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hansen et al v. Central Waters Brewing Co Inc
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Angela Hansen and Brendon Smith
Defendant:
Central Waters Brewing Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hess v. MedTorque Inc
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hess
Defendant:
MedTorque Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Reed v. Vintage Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03186
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Reed
Defendant:
Vintage Healthcare Services, Inc. and Eno Akano
Haney et al v. Zeske
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Bailee Haney and James Frank
Defendant:
Chad Zeske and Chad Zeske doing business as Holy Smokes
HENSLEY v. CITY OF CONNERSVILLE AND ITS FAYETTE COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS)
as 1:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
JOSH HENSLEY, SHAINA LAUGHLIN, CHARLEY CATT and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE AND ITS FAYETTE COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
