Cases 1 - 10 of 1,010
NEAWEDDE v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00963
Plaintiff:
KAREN NEAWEDDE
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC and DEREK HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Castelli v. JSN Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04574
Plaintiff:
Brianna Castelli
Defendant:
JSN Network, Inc. and McHenry Donuts, Inc. doing business as Dunkin' Donuts/Baskin robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Sirreayah v. Milan Laser Hair Removal
as 1:2024cv04498
Plaintiff:
Nyjiela Sirreayah
Defendant:
Milan Laser Hair Removal
GIVENS v. COUNTRYMARK REFINING & LOGISTICS, LLC
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
SHAWN GIVENS
Defendant:
COUNTRYMARK REFINING & LOGISTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
LIGON v. DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
JASON LIGON
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Burke v. Chicago Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv04116
Plaintiff:
Christine Burke
Defendant:
Chicago Public Schools, Chicago Board Of Education, Human Resources Department of the Chicago Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
GRIPPALDI v. UNITED HEALTHCARE OPTUM SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
SHONNA GRIPPALDI
Defendant:
UNITED HEALTHCARE OPTUM SERVICES and KATRINA THORB
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Lindsey v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03483
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lindsey
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Barnett v. Chicago Public Schools
as 1:2024cv03017
Plaintiff:
Marlo Barnett
Defendant:
Chicago Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Miyler v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Adam Miyler
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
