Cases 1 - 10 of 21
RICHARDSON v. CITY OF MARTINSVILLE et al
as 1:2023cv01701
Plaintiff:
NATHAN RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CITY OF MARTINSVILLE and JOHN RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
Shalaby v. City of Chicago
as 1:2021cv05623
Plaintiff:
Hani Shalaby and Hany Shalabi
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Nanlawala v. CITY OF CHICAGO
as 1:2021cv05624
Plaintiff:
Nilofer Nanlawala
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Farid v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv04767
Plaintiff:
Laila Farid
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department and City of Chicago Law Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Weber v. Michigan City Brewing Company Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00292
Defendant:
Samuel Strupeck, Michigan City Brewing Company and Michigan City Brewing Company Inc
Plaintiff:
Roseanne Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sroga v. City of Chicago
as 1:2019cv01814
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sroga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCING IRON WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 22 V. CAPTIAL CITY STEEL INC. ET AL
as 1:2015cv01296
Defendant:
CAPITAL CITY STEEL, INC. and GHG CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCING IRON WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 22
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Snyder v. City of Chicago
as 1:2015cv01160
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Anthony Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
The Arc of the Quad Cities Area v. Singleton
as 1:2014cv00763
Plaintiff:
The Arc of the Quad Cities Area
Defendant:
Camise Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLaurin et al v. Gary City of
as 3:2013cv01132
Plaintiff:
Juana D McLaurin , Sonji Draper , Charlotte Thompson and others
Defendant:
Gary City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
