Cases 71 - 80 of 194
Woodway USA Inc v. Samsara Fitness LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00956
Plaintiff:
Woodway USA Inc
Defendant:
Samsara Fitness LLC and Chapco Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Genesis Attachments, LLC v. Exodus Machines USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
Genesis Attachments, LLC
Defendant:
Exodus Machines USA, Inc. and Exodus Machines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Transcenic, Inc. v. Nokia Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv06434
Plaintiff:
Transcenic, Inc.
Defendant:
Nokia Corporation , Nokia USA Inc. and HERE Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Travel Caddy, Inc. v. Nautica Retail USA, Inc.
as 1:2015cv05979
Plaintiff:
Travel Caddy, Inc.
Defendant:
Nautica Retail USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hetero Labs Ltd, Unit V et al v. Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC
as 1:2015cv05396
Plaintiff:
Hetero Labs Ltd, Unit V and Hetero USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CCD Holdings LLC v. CENERGY USA, INC.
as 3:2015cv00655
Plaintiff:
CCD Holdings LLC
Defendant:
CENERGY USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. HEC PHARM USA, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00792
Plaintiff:
DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Defendant:
HEC PHARM CO., LTD. and HEC PHARM USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Raster Printing Innovations, LLC v. MGI USA Inc.
as 1:2015cv03977
Plaintiff:
Raster Printing Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
MGI USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC v. MediaTek USA Inc.
as 1:2015cv02262
Plaintiff:
Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
MediaTek USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rosetta-Wireless Corp. v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00799
Plaintiff:
Rosetta-Wireless Corp.
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
