Cases 131 - 140 of 1,274
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wakefield
as 1:2021cv05168
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Keith A Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Parkhurst
as 3:2021cv00657
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert Scott Parkhurst
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Collins et al
as 1:2021cv05040
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
James R. Collins and Robert F DiMeo
Klein v. Iterum Therapeutics plc et al
as 1:2021cv04181
Plaintiff:
Steve Klein
Defendant:
Iterum Therapeutics plc, Corey N. Fishman and Judith M. Matthews
Helwink v. Seals et al
as 1:2021cv04120
Plaintiff:
Chris Helwink
Defendant:
Anthony Seals, Blake Anthony, Inc. and Blake Anthony
SLABAUGH v. CHURCHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION IV et al
as 1:2021cv01652
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLEIN, ATIEVA, INC. doing business as LUCID MOTORS, PETER RAWLINSON and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. SLABAUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Egbon
as 2:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission and United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Blessing K Egbon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Grevas
as 1:2021cv04390
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Denise Grevas
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paris et al
as 1:2021cv03450
Defendant:
Barrington Asset Management, Inc. and Gregory David Paris
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NC Capital, LLC v. Metabolomic Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2021cv04101
Plaintiff:
NC Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Metabolomic Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
