Cases 81 - 90 of 10,847
Moore v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02890
Plaintiff:
Yulonda Moore
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Karrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
James Clay Karrick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ankebrant v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50069
Plaintiff:
Traci Ankebrant
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SCHRIER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCHRIER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Karen S. Campbell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Perez v.O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02182
Plaintiff:
Sergio Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Challoner, Shelley v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Shelley M. Challoner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MONTGOMERY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
CATHY L. MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Leonard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Corey Leonard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Spraggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Candy L. Spraggs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
