Cases 141 - 150 of 9,584
CRICHFIELD v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
JANEY MARIE CRICHFIELD
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Oliver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Jack Oliver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jebson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jordan R. Jebson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MARTIN v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
JENNIE L. MARTIN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE D. JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Moore v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50054
Plaintiff:
George W. Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BROOKS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. BROOKS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
STILTS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
SHANE D. STILTS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barnett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Meriah C. Barnett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Worstell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Bron E. Worstell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
