Cases 21 - 30 of 3,473
Bowker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jenifer L. Bowker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rybicki v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03214
Plaintiff:
John Rybicki
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Doris Hall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03126
Plaintiff:
John Rodriguez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Woesthaus v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Lynn Woesthaus
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Velasco v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Marcela Clavel Velasco
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Virgil Kelley v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1587
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL L. KELLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Jonathan Cain v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1590
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN D. CAIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Britny Casten v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1583
Plaintiff:
BRITNY N. CASTEN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Rudd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Evert Rudd, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
