Cases 41 - 50 of 18,564
Metroplex Communications, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 24-1440
Plaintiff:
METROPLEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC.
Banas v. Midwest Fidelity Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv01767
Plaintiff:
Anthony Banas
Defendant:
Midwest Fidelity Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Premera Blue Cross v. World Professional Association For Transgender Health
as 1:2024cv03316
Plaintiff:
PREMERA BLUE CROSS
Defendant:
WORLD PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR TRANSGENDER HEALTH
Crownalytics, LLC v. SPINS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01917
Plaintiff:
CROWNALYTICS LLC and Crownalytics, LLC
Defendant:
SPINS LLC, DAAP LLC, CIRCANA, LLC f/k/a Information Resources, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Nielsen Consumer LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Peck v. Nelson et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Marcus LaShawn Peck
Defendant:
William J Nelson and Marion County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. J&A Caregivers, LLC
as 1:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jackson
Defendant:
J&A Caregivers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication
Tankersley v. Murphy
as 1:2024cv01754
Plaintiff:
Tavares-Maurice Tankersley
Defendant:
Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Teague et al v. Kia America, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Brandon Teague and Tara Teague
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Comer v. Hagerty Inc
as 2:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Colin Comer
Defendant:
Hagerty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Sylvia Campos v. Tubi, Inc.
as 24-1368
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA CAMPOS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
Defendant:
TUBI, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
