Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Hopkins v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
Luke P Sinclair, Gregory Haanstad and Samuel Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hopkins v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00972
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Racine County, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hopkins v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Racine County, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Luna-Carreto v. Select Portfolio Services, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv03772
Defendant:
MERS, Inc., US Bank National Assoc., Becky Christensen and others
Plaintiff:
Liliana Luna-Carreto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ratliff v. JC Christensen and Associates Inc
as 1:2016cv01583
Plaintiff:
Travis Ratliff
Defendant:
JC Christensen and Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sancen v. J.C. Christensen and Associates, Inc.
as 1:2016cv07633
Plaintiff:
Zonia Sancen
Defendant:
J.C. Christensen and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SHIELDS v. J.C. CHRISTENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01548
Defendant:
J.C. CHRISTENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. and LVNV FUNDING, LLC
Plaintiff:
DEAN SHIELDS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tripp v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc
as 1:2016cv03454
Plaintiff:
Deanna Tripp
Defendant:
J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bernal v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01876
Plaintiff:
Anisa Bernal
Defendant:
J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc. and LVNV Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Waychunas v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc
as 1:2015cv11817
Plaintiff:
Mary Waychunas
Defendant:
J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
