Cases 101 - 110 of 352
INDIANA FINE WINE & SPIRITS, LLC v. COOK ET AL
as 1:2020cv00741
Defendant:
Commissioner Dale Grubb, Vice Chairman John Krauss, Chairman David Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Indiana Fine Wine & Spirits, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Anthony Cook v. USA
as 20-1282
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY D. COOK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Preston Bennett v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 20-8005
Respondent:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and THOMAS J. DART
Petitioner:
PRESTON BENNETT
Williams v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2020cv00759
Defendant:
County of Cook and Joseph Berrios
Plaintiff:
Damon Charles Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffrey Ferguson v. Cook County Correctional Facil, et al
as 20-1185
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY/CERMAK and MT. SINAI HOSPITAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY D. FERGUSON
Foster-Bey v. Cook County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Toni Dunlap, Desiree Silva, Peter Vilkelis and others
Plaintiff:
Nichelle Foster-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salvatore Ziccarelli v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 20-1017
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and WYOLA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALVATORE ZICCARELLI
Harry Barnett v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 19-3505
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY C. EVANS, personally, and in his capacity as Chief Judge of Cook County, Illinois, RITA SIEGAL, KWAME RAOUL, personally, and in his capacity as Attorney General of Illinois and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY BARNETT
Amber Cannella v. Cook County Department of Cor, et al
as 19-3469
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART and COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMBER C. CANNELLA
Michael Moreno Bey v. City of Chicago, et al
as 19-3451
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, A. R. FLORES, J. R. LENSKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MORENO BEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
