Cases 11 - 20 of 3,608
Doe et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv04324
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Defendant:
MERRICK B GARLAND, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Webb v. Quintairos, Prieto, Boyer & Wood, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv04082
Plaintiff:
John Webb
Defendant:
Quintairos, Prieto, Boyer & Wood, P.A., Maxson Mago & Macaulay, LLP, Anthony Schumann and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03853
Plaintiff:
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP, Nicholas Angelides, Perry Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Olsauskas et al v. Minto Development Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03764
Plaintiff:
Lina Olsauskas, Marquetta Williams, Jonathan Williams and others
Defendant:
Minto Development Corporation, Benhti Economic Development Corporation, Douglas William Isaacson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Spurr v. Greenline Loans et al
as 1:2024cv03614
Defendant:
Jessi Lee Phillips Lorenzo, Greenline Loans, Waawaatesi LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Spurr
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Naquon Phillips v. John Tharp, Jr.
as 24-1614
Petitioner:
NAQUON PHILLIPS
Respondent:
JOHN J. THARP, JR.
United States Steel Corporation v. Summit Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
United States Steel Corporation
Defendant:
Summit Inc, Stone Transport LP, Load n Go Express LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Damages to Interstate Shipments by Motor Carriers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
