Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Charles Hart v. James Greer, et al
as 19-2883
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTIN VASQUEZ, LON BECHER, LAURA FRAZIER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HART
USA v. Emmanuel Hart
as 18-2833
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMMANUEL L. HART
CyrusOne LLC v. The City of Aurora, Illinois et al
as 1:2018cv00272
Plaintiff:
CyrusOne LLC
Defendant:
The City of Aurora, Illinois , Richard C. Irvin, Robert O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Emmanuel Hart
as 17-3552
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMMANUEL L. HART
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MATTESON et al v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01493
Plaintiff:
JASON BARRIOS, TERESA BAUDOUR, FELICIA BONSER and others
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
The Joint Official Liquidators of Caribbean Island Developments Limited v. Re/Max Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02542
Plaintiff:
The Joint Official Liquidators of Caribbean Island Developments Limited
Defendant:
Re/Max Holdings, Inc., RMCO, LLC, Re/Max, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al v. Borlabi et al
as 1:2014cv03073
Plaintiff:
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Alcatel-Lucent Retirement Income Plan and Lucent Technologies Inc. Pension Plan
Defendant:
Samuel Borlabi, Albert Brown, Oscar Calderon and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
