Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Murillo v. Kohl's Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00196
Plaintiff:
Miguel Murillo , Michael Baehman and Bonnie Baehman
Defendant:
Kohl's Corporation and Kohl's Department Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beaty v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Beverly Beaty
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Kasemodel v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01181
Plaintiff:
Eric Kasemodel
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Hernandez v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01180
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hernandez
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Le v. Kohl's Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv01171
Defendant:
Kohl's Corporation and Kohl's Department Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Victor Le
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ayres v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00778
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ayres
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Kiel v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kiel
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Alexander v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc
as 2:2014cv01395
Plaintiff:
Cory Alexander
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
KELLY v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 1:2014cv01499
Plaintiff:
SHARLOT KELLY
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Briggs and Morgan, P.A. v. Manley Toys Ltd. et al
as 2:2013mc00065
Creditor:
Briggs and Morgan, P.A.
Debtor:
Manley Toys Ltd.
Garnishee:
Kohl's Corporation, Kohl's Department Stores Inc, Kohl's Indiana, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
