Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ring v. Vedder Price, P.C. et al
as 1:2011cv01159
Plaintiff:
Berton N Ring
Defendant:
Vedder Price, P.C., Development Specialists, Inc. and Fred C Caruso
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Richard Wade Architects, Inc. v. TRZ, Ltd. d/b/a Veneer Specialists, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02579
Plaintiff:
Richard Wade Architects, Inc.
Defendant:
TRZ, Ltd. d/b/a Veneer Specialists, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Canadian National Railway Co v. Warehouse Specialists Inc
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Canadian National Railway Co
Defendant:
Warehouse Specialists Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Canadian National Railway Co v. Warehouse Specialists Inc
as 2:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Canadian National Railway Co
Defendant:
Warehouse Specialists Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Dockery v. Medical Recovery Specialists, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02676
Plaintiff:
Thomas F. Dockery and Thomas F. Dockery
Defendant:
Medical Recovery Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
