Cases 21 - 30 of 3,606
United States Steel Corporation v. Summit, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
United States Steel Corporation
Defendant:
Summit, Inc., Stone Transport, LP, Load n Go Express LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Damages to Interstate Shipments by Motor Carriers
David Campbell v. County of Vanderburgh, et al
as 24-8008
Petitioner:
DAVID JOHN CAMPBELL
Respondent:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY, INDIANA, VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STANLEY LEVCO and others
Mazen Agha v. SoFi Lending Corp., et al
as 24-1485
Plaintiff:
MAZEN HASAN AGHA
Defendant:
SOFI LENDING CORP., SOFI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
NEARON v. NEWREZ LLC
as 1:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
John Nearon
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cohen v. Arnold Scott Harris, P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv02324
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
Arnold Scott Harris, P.C., Harris & Harris, Ltd. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
David Gevas v. John Varga, et al
as 24-8006
Petitioner:
DAVID C. GEVAS
Respondent:
JOHN VARGA, SONJA NICKLAUS and JUSTIN WILKS
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01864
Plaintiff:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Defendant:
john doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Sexton v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Ying Gao Sexton
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
