Cases 21 - 30 of 157
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. GONZALES
as 1:2012cv01641
Defendant:
RUBEN GONZALES
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Gonzales v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv02789
Plaintiff:
Emilio Gonzales
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. GONZALES
as 1:2011cv01492
Defendant:
RUBEN GONZALES
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Julio Castillo-Gonzales v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-3742
Petitioner:
JULIO C. CASTILLO-GONZALES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GONZALES & GONZALES BONDS AND INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01068
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GONZALES & GONZALES BONDS AND INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. and AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Taha v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv00981
Plaintiff:
Rashid Y Taha
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey and Emilio T Gonzales
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shah v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv04348
Plaintiff:
Asad Ahmed Shah
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey and Emilio T. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Awadalla v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv00567
Plaintiff:
Adham K Awadalla
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey and Emilio T Gonzales
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Al Khadar v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv03666
Plaintiff:
Nasar A. Al Khadar
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey and Emilio T. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
