Cases 21 - 30 of 210
Stein v. King
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
David M. Stein
Defendant:
Timothy Earl King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Furs v. Dreamcatcher Broadcasting, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03492
Plaintiff:
King Furs, Inc.
Defendant:
Dreamcatcher Broadcasting, LLC, The E.W. Scripps Company, Griffin Communications, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Indiana Right to Life Victory Fund, et al v. Holli Sullivan, et al
as 22-1562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIANA RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND and SARKES TARZIAN, INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee:
HOLLI SULLIVAN, in her official capacity as Secretary of State, INDIANA ELECTION COMMISSION, SUZANNAH WILSON OVERHOLT, in her official capacity as Vice-chair and member of the Indiana Election Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. William King
as 21-3196
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM KING
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Clifford King, Jr.
as 21-3056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLIFFORD R. KING, JR.
INDIANA RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND et al v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2021cv02796
Plaintiff:
INDIANA RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND and SARKES TARZIAN, INC.
Defendant:
HOLLI SULLIVAN, INDIANA ELECTION COMMISSION, PAUL OKESON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
