Cases 31 - 40 of 229
Doe et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2020cv07263
Plaintiff:
Nurse Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth Madsen and Kenneth Thomas Cuccinelli, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
BORJA DE ARGUETA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv03093
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe #4, Behavioral Interventions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dina Suzana Borja de Argueta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Apple Inc. v. Roslyn Hazlitt, et al
as 20-8033
Respondent:
ROSLYN HAZLITT, RICHARD ROBINSON, YOLANDA BROWN and others
Petitioner:
APPLE INC.
Joshua Cheek v. Corinna Lundquist, et al
as 20-3181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA CHEEK
Defendant / Appellee:
CORINNA LUNDQUIST and JANE DOE
Timothy Elkins, Jr. v. Michael Remmers, et al
as 20-2956
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. ELKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL D. REMMERS, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Wesley Johnson v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 20-2947
Defendant / Appellee:
SIU ENT, MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOHN & JANE DOES, Medical Dental and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESLEY JOHNSON
Antonio Mays v. Sergeant Lannoye, et al
as 20-2747
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KAMMER, JOHN & JANE DOES, Numbers 1-4 and SERGEANT LANNOYE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO MAYS and ANTONIO D. MAYS
Thomas Powers v. Krista Wilcoxen, et al
as 20-2626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, KRISTA WILCOXEN, JANE DOE and others
Montez Dunklin v. Doctor Bemesida, et al
as 20-2417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTEZ DUNKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, 1 male nurse, DOCTOR BEMESIDA, JANE DOES, 2 female nurses and others
Thomas Powers v. Sharlene Caraway, et al
as 20-2323
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY TEEL, PAULA LODGE, LOUIE SISTO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
