Cases 31 - 40 of 118
APTIM Corp. v. Allied Power Management, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv05269
Plaintiff:
APTIM Corp.
Defendant:
Allied Power Management, LLC , Bernhard Capital Partners Management LP , Dean Sack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GONZALEZ v. AFFILIATE ASSET SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01843
Defendant:
AFFILIATE ASSET SOLUTIONS, LLC and PENDRICK CAPITAL PARTNERS, II, LLC
Plaintiff:
FRANSOLY GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services Inc et al
as 2:2017mc00021
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
AMG Services Inc, Red Cedar Services Inc, SFS Inc and others
Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2017mc04002
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
AMG Services, Inc., Red Cedar Services, Inc., SFS, Inc. and others
Huisman v. Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC
as 1:2017cv02410
Plaintiff:
John Huisman
Defendant:
Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Maxwell v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01224
Plaintiff:
Shelley Maxwell
Defendant:
Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC and Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services Inc et al
as 2:2017mc00005
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
AMG Services Inc, Red Cedar Services Inc, SFS Inc and others
Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2016mc00014
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
AMG Services, Inc., Red Cedar Services, Inc., SFS, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
