Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Natalie Hoisington v. USA
as 16-3773
Petitioner:
NATALIE HOISINGTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Monahan et al v. Koch Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09490
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Monahan , Frank Coe , Lester Patterson and others
Defendant:
Koch Foods, Inc. , JCG Foods of Alabama, LLC , JCG Foods of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02517
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Percy et al v. Koch Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv08931
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Percy , Gloria J. Lathen , Jonas Dimas and others
Defendant:
Koch Foods, Inc. , JCG Foods of Alabama, LLC , JCG Foods of Georgia,LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gumm et al v. Molinaroli et al
as 2:2016cv01093
Plaintiff:
Arlene D Gumm , Paul J Pontier , Cynthia Pontier and others
Defendant:
Alex A Molinaroli , Brian J Stief , Greg Guyett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Family Video Movie Club, Inc. v. Darvette Smith, et al
as 15-8026
Petitioner:
FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC.
Respondent:
BLAKE BREZINSKY, ERIN BOX, DARVETTE SMITH, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
