Cases 41 - 50 of 97
The Carlson Group, Inc. v. Davenport et al
as 1:2016cv10520
Plaintiff:
The Carlson Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Davenport , Brad Kurz , Redstitch LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
International Union of Operati, et al v. Brad Schimel, et al
as 16-3834
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 139 and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 420
Defendant - Appellant:
BRAD D. SCHIMEL and JAMES R. SCOTT
International Union of Operati, et al v. Brad Schimel, et al
as 16-3736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 139 and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 420
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD D. SCHIMEL and JAMES R. SCOTT
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 139 et al v. Schimel et al
as 2:2016cv00590
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 139 and International Union of Operating Engineers Local 420
Defendant:
Brad D Schimel and James R Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Christopher Kemp Notice of Estoppel
as 2:2016mc00007
Petitioner:
Christopher Arnell Kemp
Respondent:
Brad D Schimel
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
SWALLERS v. SKAGGS, et al.
as 1:2016mc00007
Counter Defendant:
REBECCA BRELAGE, EDWARD GEORGE BURGE, DAVID CERTO and others
Federal District Case) (1:14-cv-1681-SEB-DKL:
COURT OF RECORD
49D09-1410-JM-00864) (49D09-1509-JC-002845:
MARION SUPERIOR COURT JUVENILE DIVISION
Counter Claimant:
A. S. and BRENT SWALLERS
Meade v. Chiarello et al
as 2:2015mc00061
Petitioner:
Edward Alex Meade
Respondent:
Joe Chiarello, Edward Wall and Brad D Schimel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE MOTION TO MODIFY SUBPOENA
as 1:2015mc00090
Petitioner:
BFM TRANSPORTATION, LLC and BRAD F. MEYER
Respondent:
THOMAS GIOVENCO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
