Cases 41 - 50 of 343
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC. v. VICARS et al
as 4:2015cv00185
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC.
Defendant:
LEANN RICHARDSON, THE WING COMPANY LLC and DARLENE VICARS
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite Comm.
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Dotson et al
as 1:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Glen Robert Dotson and Dotson R Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC. v. ALFORD, et al.
as 1:2015cv01773
Defendant:
ANGELINA S ALFORD and TAG'S PUB AND EATERY LLC
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. McKissick et al
as 2:2015cv00919
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Carol A McKissick and Sly Star LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Hibbard
as 3:2015cv03102
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Jettery Hibbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Mr. Taco Grill & Cantina LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Mr. Taco Grill & Cantina LLC and Alejandro Morales
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC. v. BACKES, et al.
as 3:2015cv00028
Defendant:
JOHN BACKES and BACKES FRONTIER LLC
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Matijevich et al
as 2:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Robert J Matijevich and UDL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Younger
as 3:2015cv50043
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew Younger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2014cv09157
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Isela Hernandez, Oscar Arrandas and Idle Hour Ezkape Lounge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
