Cases 71 - 80 of 912
USA v. Daniel Holland
as 22-1402
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL HOLLAND
Hill et al v. Cargo Runner Co.
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Leslie Hill, Daniel Quaca and Cheyenne Quaca
Defendant:
Cargo Runner Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shah v. PayPal, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00795
Plaintiff:
Vivek Shah
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc. and Daniel H. Schulman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brown v. Deere & Co.
as 3:2022cv50039
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Ostego Forestry Services
Defendant:
Deere & Co. doing business as John Deere
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv50041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company v. Osowski et al
as 2:2022cv02020
Plaintiff:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Defendant:
Christopher Osowski and Green Plains, Inc.
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. CRG Real Estate LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
CRG Real Estate LLC, DHSCHOTTZ LLC doing business as Schottz, Daniel H Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Federal Communications Act of 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
