Cases 71 - 80 of 343
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Holmes
as 3:2013cv01415
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Lee E Holmes
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Morales et al
as 1:2013cv01422
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Luis A Morales and Mr. Frogs Nightclub LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Ramos et al
as 1:2013cv08740
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Luis Ramos and El Sazon Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Chang et al
as 1:2013cv08741
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Won Chang and Nari Restaurant Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Zeng et al
as 1:2013cv08601
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Tony Zeng and J & T Evergreen Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Zeng et al
as 1:2013cv01565
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Tony Zeng and J & T Evergreen Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Love Goat LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01301
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Love Goat LLC and Christopher Surges
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Serrato et al
as 2:2013cv00409
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Miguel Serrato and Miguel Mexican Fusion Grill LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC v. BALDWIN et al
as 1:2013cv01646
Defendant:
ALICE BALDWIN and BUCKS TAVERN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC. v. FISHBURN
as 1:2013cv01644
Defendant:
TIMOTHY H. FISHBURN and DAVID M. RICKELMAN
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
