Cases 1 - 10 of 812
Lagmanson et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08721
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lagmanson, Brian Belderrain and Anthony R Reyes
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Markets, Inc., E*Trade Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bashi v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv06521
Defendant:
Anthony Blinken, Director Christopher A. Wray, District Director Thomas Cioppa and others
Plaintiff:
Rima Oda Bashi
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
In Re: Anthony Canty
as 1:2024cv08439
Unknown:
Anthony Canty
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Nasim v. Embassy of the United States, Islamabad et al
as 1:2024cv05868
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Anthony Blinken, Embassy of the United States, Islamabad and others
Plaintiff:
Danish Nasim
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01892
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roland v. NBC Subsidiary (WMAQ-TV) LLC
as 1:2024cv04500
Defendant:
NBC Subsidiary (WMAQ-TV) LLC
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv05867
Defendant:
U.S. Consul General Donald Blome, USA and Anthony Blinken
Plaintiff:
Danish Nasim
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Webb v. Quintairos, Prieto, Boyer & Wood, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv04082
Defendant:
Michael Cohen, Steven A. Wood, Maxson Mago & Macaulay, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
John Webb
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
