Cases 1 - 10 of 16
City of Chicago, et al v. Jeffrey I. Cummings
as 24-2094
Petitioner:
CITY OF CHICAGO, WILLIAM MOSER, JOHN E. BYRNE and others
Respondent:
JEFFREY I. CUMMINGS
Interested Party:
JAMES GIBSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jon Burg v. Aon plc, et al
as 21-2684
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AON PLC, AON GROUP, INC. and AON CONSULTING INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
JON BURG
Burg et al v. Levine & Bazelon SC
as 2:2016cv01234
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burg and Jeff Klass
Defendant:
Levine & Bazelon SC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SWALLERS v. SKAGGS, et al.
as 1:2016mc00007
Counter Defendant:
REBECCA BRELAGE, EDWARD GEORGE BURGE, DAVID CERTO and others
Federal District Case) (1:14-cv-1681-SEB-DKL:
COURT OF RECORD
49D09-1410-JM-00864) (49D09-1509-JC-002845:
MARION SUPERIOR COURT JUVENILE DIVISION
Counter Claimant:
A. S. and BRENT SWALLERS
Mogell v. Calhoun et al
as 1:2015cv01239
Plaintiff:
Rosalee Mogell
Defendant:
David L. Calhoun, Daniel M. Dickinson, Juan Gallardo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
USA v. Mark Burge
as 11-3495
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK C. BURGE
USA v. Jon Burge
as 11-1277
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JON BURGE
Oakland County Employees' Retirement System v. Massaro et al
as 1:2009cv06284
Defendant:
George E. Massaro, Dubose Ashley, James D. Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Oakland County Employees' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Fisher et al v. Holdren
as 1:2009cv05475
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fisher and Thomas Fisher
Defendant:
Huron Consulting Group, Inc., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
