Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Frances Denney, et al v. Amphenol Corp., et al
as 23-8022
Petitioner:
FRANCES DENNEY and ARTHUR TERHUNE
Respondent:
AMPHENOL CORP., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., BORGWARNER, INC. and others
Reena Reynolds, et al v. Skyline Real Estate Limited, et al
as 23-2731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REENA REYNOLDS and SHALINI SHARMA
Defendant / Appellee:
SKYLINE REAL ESTATE LIMITED, SKYLINE TREASURY DESIGNATED ACTIVITY COMPANY, UNICORN REAL ESTATE LIMITED and others
Kirby v. Sheehan
as 1:2023cv00936
Defendant:
Joseph C. Sheehan also known as Joseph Mary Sheehan also known as Joseph CM Sheehan doing business as BMP Galway LLC, Joseph Mary Sheehan, Joseph CM Sheehan and others
Plaintiff:
Myles Kirby
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frances Endencia v. American Psychiatric Association, et al
as 22-1229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCES ENDENCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION, GIL MARTINEZ, SR., WENDY VAUGHN, Zeke Legal Clinic of NIU and others
Kazan Soda Elektrik Uretim A.S. et al
as 1:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Kazan Soda Elektrik Uretim A.S., Ciner ic ve dis Ticaret A.S., We Soda Kimya Yatirimlari A.S. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Solvay S.A., Solvay Chemicals International S.A. and Solvay Operations France S.A.S.
Endencia v. American Psychiatric Association et al
as 1:2021cv02360
Defendant:
Laua Siedleski, Dr. Stafford Henry, Gil Martinez, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Frances Endencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donald Weaver, Jr. v. Correctional Medical Services,, et al
as 21-1641
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVEEN RAJOLI, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD E. WEAVER, JR.
Andrew Johnston v. Frances Ward, et al
as 21-1221
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER and FRANCES WARD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW J. JOHNSTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
