Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brandon Gentry v. State of Indiana
as 21-1609
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON GENTRY
Timothy Gentry, et al v. Southern District of Illinois
as 20-2533
Petitioner:
NATHAN A. DEBRUZZI and TIMOTHY L. GENTRY
Respondent:
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Floyd County, Indiana, et al v. Tabitha Gentry, et al
as 16-8014
Petitioner:
FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, DARRELL MILLS, Individually and in his capacity as Floyd County Sheriff, TIFFANY FRANS, Individually and others
Respondent:
TABITHA GENTRY, VINCENT MINTON, MICHAEL HERRON and others
Gentry v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00633
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gentry
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
IMO 2014 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2014mc00062
Respondent:
Sara Elizabeth Corbat, Danel Michelle Nickels, Duane Jonathan Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Wisconsin Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Preferred Concrete & Excavating, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02496
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Laborers Pension Fund, Wisconsin Laborers Pension Fund, Wisconsin Laborers Health Fund and others
Defendant:
Preferred Concrete & Excavating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
