Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Asher et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00238
Plaintiff:
Cory Feltner, Anna Standafer, Alex Powell and others
Defendant:
Andrews Dairy Store Inc, Lear Corporation Eeds and Interiors, LLC, CP Product LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IMO 2018 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 1:2018mc00026
In Re:
Lauren Kathleen Griffin, Michael John Bellich, Thomas William Belleperche and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2018mc00038
Respondent:
ANDREW JOHN ALBRIGHT, MICHAEL EUGENE ALLEN, MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
