Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Newman v. Integrity Marketing Group, LLC
as 1:2024cv03188
Plaintiff:
Wes Newman
Defendant:
Integrity Marketing Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hossfeld et al v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv02613
Plaintiff:
Robert Hossfeld and Wes Newman
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Newman v. Florida Insurance Services, Inc. d/b/a Senior Life Services et al
as 1:2023cv16980
Plaintiff:
Wesley Newman
Defendant:
Florida Insurance Services, Inc. d/b/a Senior Life Services and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Newman v. My Lifetime Advisors, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv16981
Plaintiff:
Wesley Newman
Defendant:
My Lifetime Advisors, LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Richard Sharif v. Horace Fox, Jr., et al
as 23-2578
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD SHARIF
Defendant / Appellee:
HORACE FOX, JR., BRUCE DE'MEDICI, ARTHUR NEWMAN and others
Newman v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04845
Plaintiff:
Wes Newman
Defendant:
Benefytt Technologies, Inc., TogetherHealth Insurance, LLC, Daylight Beta Parent Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
THOMAS v. DCS et al
as 1:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
BRENDA THOMAS
Defendant:
DCS, SHAMEKA NEWMAN and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. William Newman
as 21-1418
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. NEWMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
