Cases 11 - 20 of 134
Kallin v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 2:2017cv01807
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Kallin
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
LEE v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 4:2017cv00082
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
United States of America v. Fozzard et al
as 2:2016cv00543
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jerry Fozzard, Fozzard Personnel Services, Inc, JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Lindsay Jenkin
as 16-3969
Plaintiff - Appellee:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
LINDSAY JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
30 E. HURON CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT
Defendant:
JACKSON, JAMIE GREGORY, EK PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv08075
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Edward Jones, Jr. v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 15-2893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Jones v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2015cv04219
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mu Bey v. JP. Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2014cv09912
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Mu Bey
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wirbicki Law Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cynthia Harris, et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 14-2885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYNTHIA HARRIS and TERRANCE HOLLOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., by merger with CHASE HOME FINANCE and RESIDENTIAL LOAN CENTERS OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
