Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Bank of America NA v. Palmisano et al
as 3:2011cv01019
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA
Defendant:
Mark Palmisano, Carla Palmisano, First Collinsville Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STATE OF INDIANA et al v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00799
Defendant:
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, INC., BANK OF AMERICA, NA, CHASE HOME MORTGAGE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BARRETT BATES and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Schulze et al
as 1:2011cv00762
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Kathleen J Schulze , Michael W Schulze , Bank of America, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Bohringer v. EquiFirst Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Bohringer
Defendant:
EquiFirst Corporation, Bank of America NA , Adler Financial and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Torres et al
as 1:2010cv08193
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Dagoberto Torres, Rosario Gracio and Bank of America, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamus, Christine et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 3:2010cv00682
Plaintiff:
Christine Hamus and Perry Hamus
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Bank of America, NA, Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bank of America NA v. MHM Realty LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA
Defendant:
MHM Realty LLC, MHM Operations Inc, Michael D LaFollette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Bank of America NA v. Home Lumber Company LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00170
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA
Defendant:
Home Lumber Company LLC, Home Lumber Company Inc, United States Small Business Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
