Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Smith v. Huff et al
as 1:2020cv01602
Defendant:
Vincent Huff and Hirschbach Motor Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUFF v. HURLEY, et al
as 4:2019cv00030
Defendant:
Marion Hurley and A & R Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shellie Huff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUFF et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02234
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
HOWARD HUFF and SARAH HUFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hamby et al v. Bayer Corp et al
as 3:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Nichole Hamby , Shirley D Gonzalez , Keisha S Carney and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUFF v. COOK INCORPORATED
as 1:2016cv03030
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Unknown:
James McGinnis Boyers, Kip S.M. McDonald, James McGinnis Boyers and others
317) 639-6444 (fax:
Douglas B. King, Douglas B. King and Douglas B. King
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA D. HUFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HUFF v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2016cv02988
Plaintiff:
CARLA HUFF
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HUFF v. WALMART STORES, INC.
as 4:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
NANCY D. HUFF
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Huff v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2016cv07754
Plaintiff:
Marion Huff
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huff v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00368
Plaintiff:
Matthew Huff
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUFF v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01991
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HAGAN HUFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
